Motorola Moto G62 (India) vs Redmi K80 Pro

The Motorola Moto G62 (India) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Redmi K80 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 31/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi K80 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,660 vs 592,015); the Redmi K80 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto G62 (India) doesn't; the Motorola Moto G62 (India) is noticeably lighter (184g vs 215g).

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) by 40 points (71/100 vs 31/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G62 (India)
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 36
Design 70
Value for money 55
Redmi K80 Pro
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 63
Battery 79
Design 31
Value for money 75
What makes Motorola Moto G62 (India) better?
  • Lighter: 184g vs 215g

  • Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Redmi K80 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014660 vs 592015
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 905
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 2003
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (63/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (79/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better value for money (75/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G62 (India) vs the Redmi K80 Pro, the Redmi K80 Pro scores 40 points higher (71/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (63/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (79/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (75/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) (63/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) (79/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G62 (India) significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (70/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) (75/100 vs 55/100).

Motorola Moto G62 (India): The Motorola Moto G62 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.
Redmi K80 Pro: The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G62 (India) Redmi K80 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 592015 3014660
Geekbench Single 905 3050
Geekbench Multi 2003 9300
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 15W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 32 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 20 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.8×74.0×8.6 mm 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm
Weight 184 g 215 g
Price $511
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G62 (India)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera
Redmi K80 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G62 (India)
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G62 (India)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
79
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G62 (India) and Redmi K80 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G62 (India) Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
31/100
592015 AnTuTu
Redmi K80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +80.4%
3014660 AnTuTu

Redmi K80 Pro leads Motorola Moto G62 (India) by 80.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Moto G62 (India)
Price unknown
Redmi K80 Pro
$511
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) (68/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) (63/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) (79/100 vs 36/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G62 (India) significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (70/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) (75/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G62 (India) or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G62 (India) by 40 points (71/100 vs 31/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G62 (India) and the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G62 (India) has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Redmi K80 Pro — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G62 (India) or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G62 (India) or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on performance (68/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G62 (India) over the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G62 (India) is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.