Motorola Moto G55 vs Redmi A7 Pro
The Motorola Moto G55 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Redmi A7 Pro (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7250; estimated prices are $261 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G55 leads — 34/100 vs 26/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi A7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Moto G55 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi A7 Pro doesn't; the Motorola Moto G55 is noticeably lighter (179g vs 198g).
Motorola Moto G55
Redmi A7 Pro
- Faster charging: 30W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 179g vs 198g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper: $130 vs $261
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 39/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 92/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G55 vs the Redmi A7 Pro, the Motorola Moto G55 scores 8 points higher (34/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G55 leads (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G55 significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi A7 Pro is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G55 notably outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro (76/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A7 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 92/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G55 | Redmi A7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Unisoc T7250 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 310000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 600 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1800 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1640x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 / HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP52 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.1 mm | 171.5×79.5×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 198 g | |
| Price | $261 | $130 |
Motorola Moto G55
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi A7 Pro
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Moto G55
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi A7 Pro
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1640x720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G55
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Redmi A7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $131. Redmi A7 Pro is cheaper by $131.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G55 significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro (31/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi A7 Pro is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G55 notably outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro (76/100 vs 52/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi A7 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 92/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G55 or the Redmi A7 Pro?
The Motorola Moto G55 edges out the Redmi A7 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G55 and the Redmi A7 Pro?
The Motorola Moto G55 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Redmi A7 Pro — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G55 or the Redmi A7 Pro?
The Motorola Moto G55 leads on camera score (31/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G55 over the Redmi A7 Pro?
The Motorola Moto G55 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi A7 Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.