Motorola Moto G37 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Motorola Moto G37 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $239 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 43/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 528,398); the Motorola Moto G37 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 by 46 points (89/100 vs 43/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G37

Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 48
Portability 66
Value for money 38

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Motorola Moto G37 better?

  • Lighter: 191g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $239 vs $799

  • Better portability (66/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 528398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1980
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 20W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G37 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 46 points higher (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G37 — 38/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 (92/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G37 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (66/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G37 Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 6300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 528398 4602290
Geekbench Single 771 3639
Geekbench Multi 1980 11047
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1604 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 20W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1050 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 166.2×76.5×7.8 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 191 g 227 g
Launch price $239 $799

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G37

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G37

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1604
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G37

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G37 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G37 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
43/100
528398 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +88.5%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Motorola Moto G37 by 88.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G37

$239

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $560. Motorola Moto G37 was $560 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 (99/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 (99/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 (78/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 (92/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G37 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (66/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G37 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G37 by 46 points (89/100 vs 43/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G37 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G37 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G37 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G37 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G37 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.