Motorola Moto G35 vs ZTE Axon 40
The Motorola Moto G35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 46/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 628,581).
Motorola Moto G35
ZTE Axon 40
- Lighter: 188g vs 200g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 53/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 628581
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2186
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G35 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 12 points higher (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (51/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G35 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (68/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G35 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2186 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.3×76.0×7.8 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Motorola Moto G35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Motorola Moto G35
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Moto G35 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Motorola Moto G35 by 37.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (61/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (51/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G35 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (68/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G35 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G35 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G35 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Motorola Moto G35 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G35 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G35 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G35 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Motorola Moto G35 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.