Motorola Moto G14 vs Samsung Galaxy A07
The Motorola Moto G14 (2023) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T616, while the Samsung Galaxy A07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $104 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A07 leads — 26/100 vs 20/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A07 is faster in AnTuTu (533,135 vs 220,000); the Motorola Moto G14 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A07 doesn't.
Motorola Moto G14
Samsung Galaxy A07
- Lighter: 177g vs 184g
- Cheaper: $104 vs $120
- Better design/ergonomics (78/100 vs 70/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 533135 vs 220000
- Better Geekbench Single: 760 vs 400
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1890 vs 1350
- Faster charging: 25W vs 15W
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G14 vs the Samsung Galaxy A07, the Samsung Galaxy A07 scores 6 points higher (26/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G14 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 and the Motorola Moto G14 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G14 is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Motorola Moto G14 | Samsung Galaxy A07 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T616 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 220000 | 533135 | |
| Geekbench Single | 400 | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1350 | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×73.8×8.0 mm | 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 177 g | 184 g | |
| Price | $104 | $120 |
Motorola Moto G14
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A07
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Moto G14
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A07
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Moto G14
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A07
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Moto G14 and Samsung Galaxy A07, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A07 leads Motorola Moto G14 by 58.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $16. Motorola Moto G14 is cheaper by $16.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G14 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 and the Motorola Moto G14 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G14 is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G14 or the Samsung Galaxy A07?
The Samsung Galaxy A07 edges out the Motorola Moto G14 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G14 and the Samsung Galaxy A07?
The Motorola Moto G14 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Samsung Galaxy A07 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G14 over the Samsung Galaxy A07?
The Motorola Moto G14 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A07 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.