Motorola Moto E32 (India) vs Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
The Motorola Moto E32 (India) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G37, while the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) leads — 30/100 vs 23/100 (a 7-point difference).
Motorola Moto E32 (India)
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Lighter: 185g vs 188g
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 65/100)
- Faster charging: 44W vs 10W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto E32 (India) vs the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India), the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) scores 7 points higher (30/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (India) (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the Motorola Moto E32 (India) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E32 (India) and the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Moto E32 (India) | Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G37 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 194025 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 198 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 868 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" PLS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.0×8.5 mm | 163.2×75.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Moto E32 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Moto E32 (India)
- 6.5" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto E32 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (India) (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the Motorola Moto E32 (India) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E32 (India) and the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E32 (India) or the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) edges out the Motorola Moto E32 (India) by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E32 (India) and the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Motorola Moto E32 (India) has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) — 30/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Moto E32 (India) over the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Motorola Moto E32 (India) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.