Motorola Moto E22 vs Motorola Moto G Play (2022)

The Motorola Moto E22 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G37, while the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G37. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto E22 leads — 24/100 vs 22/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4020); the Motorola Moto E22 has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) doesn't.

The Motorola Moto E22 edges out the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto E22

Performance 14
Display 44
Camera 12
Battery 32
Portability 78
Value for money —

Motorola Moto G Play (2022)

Performance 14
Display 39
Camera 12
Battery 43
Portability —
Value for money —

What makes Motorola Moto E22 better?


  • Better display (44/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Motorola Moto G Play (2022) better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4020 mAh

  • Longer battery life (43/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto E22 vs the Motorola Moto G Play (2022), the Motorola Moto E22 scores 2 points higher (24/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) leads (43/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 14/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto E22 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 12/100. In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) is a bit better (43/100 vs 32/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto E22 Motorola Moto G Play (2022)
Processor MediaTek Helio G37 MediaTek Helio G37
AnTuTu 215798 215798
Geekbench Single 198 198
Geekbench Multi 868 868
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1600 720x1600
Refresh rate 90 Hz —
Battery 4020 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging — 10W
Main camera 16 MP 16 MP
Front camera 5 MP 5 MP
RAM 3GB / 4GB 3GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB 32GB
OS Android 12 Android 12
NFC yes no
Dimensions 163.6×74.7×8.0 mm —
Weight 169 g —
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto E22

  • Main: 16MP f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
12
camera

Motorola Moto G Play (2022)

  • Main: 16MP
  • Front: 5MP
12
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto E22

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

Motorola Moto G Play (2022)

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto E22

  • 4020 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
32
battery

Motorola Moto G Play (2022)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto E22 and Motorola Moto G Play (2022), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto E22 MediaTek Helio G37
24/100
215798 AnTuTu
Motorola Moto G Play (2022) MediaTek Helio G37
22/100
215798 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 14/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto E22 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 12/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) is a bit better (43/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto E22 or the Motorola Moto G Play (2022)?

The Motorola Moto E22 edges out the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E22 and the Motorola Moto G Play (2022)?

The Motorola Moto E22 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) — 22/100.

Should you choose the Motorola Moto E22 over the Motorola Moto G Play (2022)?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Motorola Moto G Play (2022) (43/100 vs 32/100).