Motorola Moto E14 vs Redmi K80 Pro

The Motorola Moto E14 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the Redmi K80 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $79 and $511. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 20/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi K80 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,660 vs 330,006); the Redmi K80 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto E14 doesn't; the Motorola Moto E14 is noticeably lighter (178g vs 215g).

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 by 51 points (71/100 vs 20/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto E14
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 0
Battery 36
Design 77
Value for money 100
Redmi K80 Pro
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 63
Battery 79
Design 31
Value for money 75
What makes Motorola Moto E14 better?
  • Lighter: 178g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $79 vs $511

  • Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 75/100)
What makes Redmi K80 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014660 vs 330006
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 378
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1335
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (63/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (79/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto E14 vs the Redmi K80 Pro, the Redmi K80 Pro scores 51 points higher (71/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (63/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (79/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto E14 leads (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (63/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (79/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E14 significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (77/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto E14 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (100/100 vs 75/100).

Motorola Moto E14: The Motorola Moto E14 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Redmi K80 Pro: The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto E14 Redmi K80 Pro
Processor Unisoc T606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 330006 3014660
Geekbench Single 378 3050
Geekbench Multi 1335 9300
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1612 3200x1440
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 15W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 32 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 20 MP
RAM 2GB / 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 (Go edition) Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.5×74.5×8.0 mm 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm
Weight 178 g 215 g
Price $79 $511
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto E14
  • Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Redmi K80 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto E14
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto E14
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
79
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto E14 and Redmi K80 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto E14 Unisoc T606
20/100
330006 AnTuTu
Redmi K80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +89.1%
3014660 AnTuTu

Redmi K80 Pro leads Motorola Moto E14 by 89.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Moto E14
$79
Redmi K80 Pro
$511

Price difference: $432. Motorola Moto E14 is cheaper by $432.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (68/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (63/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (79/100 vs 36/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E14 significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (77/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto E14 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (100/100 vs 75/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E14 or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 by 51 points (71/100 vs 20/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E14 and the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Motorola Moto E14 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Redmi K80 Pro — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto E14 or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto E14 or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on performance (68/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto E14 over the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Motorola Moto E14 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.