Motorola Frontier 22 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
The Motorola Frontier 22 (2022) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen1, while the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads — 73/100 vs 71/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 has the bigger battery (5750 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is faster in AnTuTu (1,453,683 vs 1,290,942).
Motorola Frontier 22
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1453683 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 1967 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 5401 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 5750 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 50W
- Higher performance (73/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Motorola Frontier 22 vs the Tecno Phantom V Fold2, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 scores 2 points higher (73/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and the Motorola Frontier 22 are nearly equal (73/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100. In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Motorola Frontier 22 | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | |
| AnTuTu | 1290942 | 1453683 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1675 | 1967 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4453 | 5401 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2000x2296 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5750 mAh | |
| Charging | 50W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 60 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 Snow Cone | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HiOS 14 Fold | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.0×140.4×6.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 249 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Motorola Frontier 22
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 60MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Frontier 22
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Frontier 22
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 5750 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Frontier 22 and Tecno Phantom V Fold2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Phantom V Fold2 leads Motorola Frontier 22 by 11.2% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and the Motorola Frontier 22 are nearly equal (73/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Frontier 22 or the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 edges out the Motorola Frontier 22 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Frontier 22 and the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Motorola Frontier 22 has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — 73/100.
Should you choose the Motorola Frontier 22 over the Tecno Phantom V Fold2?
The Motorola Frontier 22 is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a better fit for active users.