Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Tecno Pova Curve

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate; launch prices were $699 and $219. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads — 89/100 vs 58/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 879,714).

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Performance 98
Display 84
Camera 90
Battery 84
Portability 61
Value for money 92

Tecno Pova Curve

Performance 55
Display 89
Camera 39
Battery 64
Portability 70
Value for money 72

What makes Motorola Edge 60 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 879714
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2813
  • Faster charging: 125W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 64/100)

What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?

  • Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5200 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 198g
  • Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $699

  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro scores 31 points higher (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (90/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (84/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Edge 60 Pro — 92/100, Tecno Pova Curve — 72/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (90/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (84/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (70/100 vs 61/100).

Motorola Edge 60 Pro: The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Edge 60 Pro Tecno Pova Curve
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
AnTuTu 3950082 879714
Geekbench Single 3639 1011
Geekbench Multi 11047 2813
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2780x1264 1080x2436
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 5500 mAh
Charging 125W 45W
Wireless charging 50W —
Main camera 200 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) — 1300 nits
NFC — yes
Protection — IP64
Dimensions — 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm
Weight 198 g 189 g
Launch price $699 $219

Camera comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

Tecno Pova Curve

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Tecno Pova Curve

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 5200 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:38 hrs, total 24:17 hrs
  • Wired: 125W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Tecno Pova Curve

  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
64
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 60 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
3950082 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova Curve Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
58/100 -349.0%
879714 AnTuTu

Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads Tecno Pova Curve by 349.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

$699

Tecno Pova Curve

$219

Launch price difference: $480. Tecno Pova Curve was $480 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (98/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (90/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (84/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (70/100 vs 61/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads on camera score (90/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads on performance (98/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 60 Pro over the Tecno Pova Curve?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.