Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs ZTE Blade V50
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo (2023) is priced at $316, the ZTE Blade V50 (2023) at $351. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads — 38/100 vs 32/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800).
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
ZTE Blade V50
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 170g vs 178g
- Cheaper: $316 vs $351
- Better camera (44/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 35/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (87/100 vs 77/100)
- Better value for money (88/100 vs 86/100)
- Overall rating 32/100
Comparing the Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs the ZTE Blade V50, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo scores 6 points higher (38/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads (44/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads (48/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (44/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit better (87/100 vs 77/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo and the ZTE Blade V50 are nearly equal (88/100 vs 86/100).
| Specification | Motorola Edge 40 Neo | ZTE Blade V50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.5" P-OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 33W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 103 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.6×72.0×7.9 mm | 161.9×72.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 170 g | 178 g | |
| Price | $316 | $351 |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade V50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 6.5" P-OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade V50
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V50
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $35. Motorola Edge 40 Neo is cheaper by $35.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (44/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a bit better (87/100 vs 77/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo and the ZTE Blade V50 are nearly equal (88/100 vs 86/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo edges out the ZTE Blade V50 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 40 Neo and the ZTE Blade V50?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the ZTE Blade V50 — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads on camera score (44/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Edge 40 Neo over the ZTE Blade V50?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade V50 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.