Motorola Defy 2 vs Redmi 7A
The Motorola Defy 2 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the Redmi 7A (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 439. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Defy 2 leads — 27/100 vs 11/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Defy 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Defy 2 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 7A doesn't; the Redmi 7A is noticeably lighter (165g vs 268g).
Motorola Defy 2
Redmi 7A
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 165g vs 268g
- Better design/ergonomics (93/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Motorola Defy 2 vs the Redmi 7A, the Motorola Defy 2 scores 16 points higher (27/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Defy 2 leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Defy 2 leads (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 7A leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Defy 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 7A (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Defy 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 7A (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Defy 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 7A (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 7A significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (93/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 7A significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Defy 2 | Redmi 7A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 193115 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 199 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 795 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 2GB / 3GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 16GB / 32GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×80.0×11.9 mm | 146.3×70.4×9.6 mm | |
| Weight | 268 g | 165 g | |
| Price | — | $90 |
Motorola Defy 2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi 7A
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Defy 2
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 7A
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Defy 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Redmi 7A
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Motorola Defy 2
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Defy 2 significantly outperforms the Redmi 7A (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Defy 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 7A (28/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Defy 2 notably outperforms the Redmi 7A (36/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 7A significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (93/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 7A significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Defy 2 or the Redmi 7A?
The Motorola Defy 2 is noticeably better than the Redmi 7A — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Defy 2 and the Redmi 7A?
The Motorola Defy 2 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Redmi 7A — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Defy 2 or the Redmi 7A?
The Motorola Defy 2 leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Defy 2 over the Redmi 7A?
The Motorola Defy 2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi 7A is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.