Meizu Note 16 Pro vs Tecno Spark 40c

The Meizu Note 16 Pro (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Tecno Spark 40c (2025) runs on the Helio G81. By overall MobileRank rating, the Meizu Note 16 Pro leads — 58/100 vs 33/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Meizu Note 16 Pro has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Meizu Note 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,041,899 vs 358,608); the Meizu Note 16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Spark 40c doesn't.

The Meizu Note 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c by 25 points (58/100 vs 33/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Meizu Note 16 Pro

Performance 60
Display 93
Camera 33
Battery 64
Portability 55
Value for money —

Tecno Spark 40c

Performance 30
Display 55
Camera 10
Battery 51
Portability 48
Value for money 54

What makes Meizu Note 16 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1041899 vs 358608
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1161 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3390 vs 1416
  • Bigger battery: 6200 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (60/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (33/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better display (93/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Tecno Spark 40c better?


  • Overall rating 33/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Meizu Note 16 Pro vs the Tecno Spark 40c, the Meizu Note 16 Pro scores 25 points higher (58/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro leads (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro leads (33/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro leads (64/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (33/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100).

Meizu Note 16 Pro: The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Meizu Note 16 Pro Tecno Spark 40c
Processor Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Helio G81
AnTuTu 1041899 358608
Geekbench Single 1161 432
Geekbench Multi 3390 1416
Display 6.8" OLED 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1224x2720 720x1600
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6200 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 80W 18W
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits —
NFC yes no
Protection IP66/IP68 IP64
Dimensions 163.8×76.2×8.4 mm 165.6×77.0×8.4 mm
Weight 198 g —
Launch price — $102

Camera comparison

Meizu Note 16 Pro

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 8MP
33
camera

Tecno Spark 40c

  • Main: 13MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Meizu Note 16 Pro

  • 6.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Tecno Spark 40c

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Battery and charging

Meizu Note 16 Pro

  • 6200 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery

Tecno Spark 40c

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Meizu Note 16 Pro and Tecno Spark 40c, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Meizu Note 16 Pro Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
58/100
1041899 AnTuTu
Tecno Spark 40c Helio G81
33/100 -190.5%
358608 AnTuTu

Meizu Note 16 Pro leads Tecno Spark 40c by 190.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Meizu Note 16 Pro

Price unknown

Tecno Spark 40c

$102

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (60/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (93/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (33/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Tecno Spark 40c?

The Meizu Note 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c by 25 points (58/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Tecno Spark 40c?

The Meizu Note 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Tecno Spark 40c — 33/100.

Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Tecno Spark 40c?

The Meizu Note 16 Pro leads on camera score (33/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Tecno Spark 40c?

The Meizu Note 16 Pro leads on performance (60/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 Pro over the Tecno Spark 40c?

The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users.