Meizu Lucky 08 vs ZEED Z-Slim
The Meizu Lucky 08 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the ZEED Z-Slim (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100. Both devices score the same overall rating of 56/100. Key differences: the Meizu Lucky 08 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Meizu Lucky 08 is faster in AnTuTu (798,429 vs 785,352); the ZEED Z-Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Meizu Lucky 08 doesn't; the ZEED Z-Slim is noticeably lighter (172g vs 202g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Lucky 08
ZEED Z-Slim
What makes Meizu Lucky 08 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 798429 vs 785352
- Better Geekbench Single: 1015 vs 995
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
What makes ZEED Z-Slim better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2925 vs 2687
- Lighter: 172g vs 202g
- Higher performance (54/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (46/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (92/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
The Meizu Lucky 08 and the ZEED Z-Slim received the same MobileRank rating — 56/100. In the "performance" category, the ZEED Z-Slim and the Meizu Lucky 08 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZEED Z-Slim is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the ZEED Z-Slim significantly outperforms the Meizu Lucky 08 (92/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Lucky 08 | ZEED Z-Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Dimensity 7100 | |
| AnTuTu | 798429 | 785352 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1015 | 995 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2687 | 2925 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.5×8.6 mm | 162.6×75.4×6.0 mm | |
| Weight | 202 g | 172 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Meizu Lucky 08
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 8MP
ZEED Z-Slim
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Meizu Lucky 08
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZEED Z-Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Meizu Lucky 08
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
ZEED Z-Slim
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu Lucky 08 and ZEED Z-Slim, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Meizu Lucky 08 leads ZEED Z-Slim by 1.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZEED Z-Slim and the Meizu Lucky 08 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZEED Z-Slim is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZEED Z-Slim significantly outperforms the Meizu Lucky 08 (92/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Lucky 08 or the ZEED Z-Slim?
Both devices scored 56/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the ZEED Z-Slim (54/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Lucky 08 and the ZEED Z-Slim?
The Meizu Lucky 08 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the ZEED Z-Slim — 56/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Lucky 08 or the ZEED Z-Slim?
The ZEED Z-Slim leads on camera score (46/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Lucky 08 over the ZEED Z-Slim?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the ZEED Z-Slim (92/100 vs 51/100).