Lava Yuva 5G vs Motorola Moto G100S
The Lava Yuva 5G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T750, while the Motorola Moto G100S (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4; launch prices were $127 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G100S leads — 51/100 vs 38/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G100S has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Moto G100S has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Yuva 5G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Yuva 5G
Motorola Moto G100S
What makes Lava Yuva 5G better?
- Lighter: 208g vs 210g
- Cheaper at launch: $127 vs $130
- Overall rating 38/100
What makes Motorola Moto G100S better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 30W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (57/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (47/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Yuva 5G vs the Motorola Moto G100S, the Motorola Moto G100S scores 13 points higher (51/100 vs 38/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G100S leads (57/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Yuva 5G — 56/100, Motorola Moto G100S — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G100S notably outperforms the Lava Yuva 5G (66/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G100S and the Lava Yuva 5G are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G100S is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G100S and the Lava Yuva 5G are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Yuva 5G | Motorola Moto G100S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T750 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 829894 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1009 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2892 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1050 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×76.2×9.1 mm | 166.2×76.5×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | $127 | $130 |
Camera comparison
Lava Yuva 5G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Moto G100S
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Yuva 5G
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Moto G100S
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Yuva 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto G100S
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $3. Lava Yuva 5G was $3 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G100S notably outperforms the Lava Yuva 5G (66/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G100S and the Lava Yuva 5G are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G100S is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G100S and the Lava Yuva 5G are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Yuva 5G or the Motorola Moto G100S?
The Motorola Moto G100S is noticeably better than the Lava Yuva 5G — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Yuva 5G and the Motorola Moto G100S?
The Lava Yuva 5G has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Motorola Moto G100S — 51/100.
Should you choose the Lava Yuva 5G over the Motorola Moto G100S?
The Motorola Moto G100S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.