Lava Virat V1 vs Redmi A5

The Lava Virat V1 (2026) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A, while the Redmi A5 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi A5 leads — 25/100 vs 21/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi A5 is faster in AnTuTu (193,858 vs 153,667).

The Redmi A5 edges out the Lava Virat V1 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Virat V1

Performance 9
Display 43
Camera 10
Battery 43
Portability 46
Value for money —

Redmi A5

Performance 11
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 42

What makes Lava Virat V1 better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 205 vs 189
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 846 vs 781
  • Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz

  • Better display (43/100 vs 32/100)

What makes Redmi A5 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 193858 vs 153667

  • Higher performance (11/100 vs 9/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Virat V1 vs the Redmi A5, the Redmi A5 scores 4 points higher (25/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi A5 leads (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi A5 and the Lava Virat V1 are nearly equal (11/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Virat V1 is a bit better (43/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Redmi A5 notably outperforms the Lava Virat V1 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi A5 notably outperforms the Lava Virat V1 (64/100 vs 46/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Virat V1 Redmi A5
Processor Unisoc SC9863A MediaTek Helio G36
AnTuTu 153667 193858
Geekbench Single 205 189
Geekbench Multi 846 781
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.9" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1600 —
Refresh rate 90 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 10W —
Main camera 13 MP 13 MP
Front camera 5 MP 5 MP
RAM 4GB 2GB / 3GB / 4GB
Storage 64GB 32GB / 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 15 —
NFC no —
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 165.0×76.1×8.5 mm —
Weight — 196 g
Launch price — $90

Camera comparison

Lava Virat V1

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Redmi A5

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Lava Virat V1

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Redmi A5

  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Battery and charging

Lava Virat V1

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Redmi A5

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Virat V1 and Redmi A5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Virat V1 Unisoc SC9863A
21/100
153667 AnTuTu
Redmi A5 MediaTek Helio G36
25/100 +20.7%
193858 AnTuTu

Redmi A5 leads Lava Virat V1 by 20.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Virat V1

Price unknown

Redmi A5

$90

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi A5 and the Lava Virat V1 are nearly equal (11/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Virat V1 is a bit better (43/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi A5 notably outperforms the Lava Virat V1 (66/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi A5 notably outperforms the Lava Virat V1 (64/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Virat V1 or the Redmi A5?

The Redmi A5 edges out the Lava Virat V1 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Virat V1 and the Redmi A5?

The Lava Virat V1 has a MobileRank rating of 21/100, the Redmi A5 — 25/100.

Should you choose the Lava Virat V1 over the Redmi A5?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Redmi A5 (66/100 vs 43/100).