Lava Storm Play vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Lava Storm Play (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $109 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 45/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 693,978); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Storm Play doesn't; the Lava Storm Play is noticeably lighter (196g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play by 44 points (89/100 vs 45/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Storm Play

Performance 51
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 59
Value for money 76

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88

What makes Lava Storm Play better?

  • Lighter: 196g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $999

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 693978
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1037
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2386
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Storm Play vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 44 points higher (89/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Storm Play — 76/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (97/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Storm Play notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (59/100 vs 40/100).

Lava Storm Play: The Lava Storm Play is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Storm Play Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 693978 3667711
Geekbench Single 1037 3639
Geekbench Multi 2386 11047
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 750 nits 3500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 168.8×78.1×8.3 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 196 g 226 g
Launch price $109 $999

Camera comparison

Lava Storm Play

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Lava Storm Play

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Lava Storm Play

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Storm Play and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Storm Play MediaTek Dimensity 7060
45/100
693978 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +81.1%
3667711 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Lava Storm Play by 81.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Storm Play

$109

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

$999

Launch price difference: $890. Lava Storm Play was $890 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (97/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (89/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (93/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (80/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Storm Play notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (59/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Storm Play or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play by 44 points (89/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Storm Play and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Lava Storm Play has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Storm Play or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Storm Play or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Lava Storm Play over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Lava Storm Play is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.