Lava Storm Play vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro

The Lava Storm Play (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme; launch prices were $109 and $350. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads — 70/100 vs 45/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,726,985 vs 693,978); the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Storm Play doesn't.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play by 25 points (70/100 vs 45/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Storm Play

Performance 51
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 59
Value for money 76

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Performance 70
Display 83
Camera 64
Battery 73
Portability 65
Value for money 74

What makes Lava Storm Play better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $350

  • Overall rating 45/100

What makes Motorola Edge 60 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1726985 vs 693978
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 1037
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 2386
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 186g vs 196g

  • Higher performance (70/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (64/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (83/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (65/100 vs 59/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Storm Play vs the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro scores 25 points higher (70/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (70/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (64/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads (73/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Storm Play — 76/100, Motorola Edge 60 Pro — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Storm Play (70/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Storm Play (83/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (64/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (73/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a bit better (65/100 vs 59/100).

Lava Storm Play: The Lava Storm Play is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro: The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Storm Play Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme
AnTuTu 693978 1726985
Geekbench Single 1037 1398
Geekbench Multi 2386 4313
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.7" pOLED
Resolution 720x1600 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 750 nits 4500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 168.8×78.1×8.3 mm 160.7×73.1×8.2 mm
Weight 196 g 186 g
Launch price $109 $350

Camera comparison

Lava Storm Play

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera

Display comparison

Lava Storm Play

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6.7" pOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Battery and charging

Lava Storm Play

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:38 hrs, total 24:17 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 15W
73
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Storm Play and Motorola Edge 60 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Storm Play MediaTek Dimensity 7060
45/100
693978 AnTuTu
Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme
70/100 +59.8%
1726985 AnTuTu

Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads Lava Storm Play by 59.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Storm Play

$109

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

$350

Launch price difference: $241. Lava Storm Play was $241 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Storm Play (70/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Storm Play (83/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (64/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play (73/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a bit better (65/100 vs 59/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Storm Play or the Motorola Edge 60 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Storm Play by 25 points (70/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Storm Play and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro?

The Lava Storm Play has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Storm Play or the Motorola Edge 60 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Storm Play or the Motorola Edge 60 Pro?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads on performance (70/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Lava Storm Play over the Motorola Edge 60 Pro?

The Lava Storm Play is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for active users.