Lava Play Ultra vs ZTE Axon 41 5G
The Lava Play Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the ZTE Axon 41 5G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 41 5G leads — 56/100 vs 53/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 41 5G is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 877,641); the Lava Play Ultra is noticeably lighter (182g vs 203g).
Lava Play Ultra
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 182g vs 203g
- Better display (79/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (71/100 vs 41/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2813
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Lava Play Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 41 5G, the ZTE Axon 41 5G scores 3 points higher (56/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G leads (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (61/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Play Ultra is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Play Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 41 5G (71/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Lava Play Ultra | ZTE Axon 41 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.4×7.8 mm | 163.9×76.2×9.5 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | $175 | — |
Lava Play Ultra
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 13MP
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Lava Play Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Lava Play Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Lava Play Ultra and ZTE Axon 41 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 41 5G leads Lava Play Ultra by 13.1% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 41 5G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (61/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Play Ultra is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Play Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 41 5G (71/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Lava Play Ultra or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G edges out the Lava Play Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Play Ultra and the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Lava Play Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the ZTE Axon 41 5G — 56/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Play Ultra or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G leads on camera score (51/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Play Ultra or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G leads on performance (61/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Lava Play Ultra over the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Lava Play Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 41 5G is a better fit for active users.