Lava Play Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Lava Play Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $175 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 53/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 879,714); the Lava Play Ultra is noticeably lighter (182g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Play Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Lava Play Ultra better?
- Lighter: 182g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $175 vs $899
- Better portability (71/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Play Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 35 points higher (88/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Play Ultra — 74/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Play Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (71/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Play Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.4×7.8 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $175 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Lava Play Ultra
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Play Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Play Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Play Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Lava Play Ultra by 73.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $724. Lava Play Ultra was $724 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (94/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (96/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (81/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Play Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (71/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Play Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra by 35 points (88/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Play Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Lava Play Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Play Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Play Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Lava Play Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.