Lava Bold N2 5G vs Poco C85 4G
The Lava Bold N2 5G (2026) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Poco C85 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra; estimated prices are $105 and $92. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C85 4G leads — 32/100 vs 20/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Lava Bold N2 5G is faster in AnTuTu (450,000 vs 358,383).
Lava Bold N2 5G
Poco C85 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 450000 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 750 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2200 vs 1416
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 43/100)
- Faster charging: 33W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Cheaper: $92 vs $105
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Lava Bold N2 5G vs the Poco C85 4G, the Poco C85 4G scores 12 points higher (32/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C85 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C85 4G significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G and the Lava Bold N2 5G are nearly equal (48/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Lava Bold N2 5G | Poco C85 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8200 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 450000 | 358383 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2200 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 810 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | — | 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 205 g | |
| Price | $105 | $92 |
Lava Bold N2 5G
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.0
- Front: 5MP
Poco C85 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Lava Bold N2 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C85 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Lava Bold N2 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Poco C85 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Lava Bold N2 5G and Poco C85 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Bold N2 5G leads Poco C85 4G by 25.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $13. Poco C85 4G is cheaper by $13.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C85 4G significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G and the Lava Bold N2 5G are nearly equal (48/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Poco C85 4G?
The Poco C85 4G is noticeably better than the Lava Bold N2 5G — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Bold N2 5G and the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Bold N2 5G has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Poco C85 4G — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Poco C85 4G?
The Poco C85 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Lava Bold N2 5G over the Poco C85 4G?
The Lava Bold N2 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Poco C85 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.