Lava Blaze Dragon vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier

The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350; launch prices were $109 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads — 73/100 vs 42/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 5000); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is faster in AnTuTu (1,724,757 vs 568,395); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Dragon doesn't; the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 210g).

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon by 31 points (73/100 vs 42/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Dragon

Performance 46
Display 56
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 41
Value for money 70

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

Performance 70
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 66
Value for money 70

What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $450

  • Overall rating 42/100

What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1724757 vs 568395
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 915
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 2115
  • Bigger battery: 5100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 18W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 193g vs 210g

  • Higher performance (70/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the Tecno Camon 40 Premier, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier scores 31 points higher (73/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (70/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (56/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Dragon — 70/100, Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (70/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (94/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (81/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (66/100 vs 41/100).

Tecno Camon 40 Premier: The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Dragon Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 8350
AnTuTu 568395 1724757
Geekbench Single 915 1398
Geekbench Multi 2115 4313
Display 6.8" LCD 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 900x1600 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5100 mAh
Charging 18W 70W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB
Storage 128GB 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 450 nits —
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm
Weight 210 g 193 g
Launch price $109 $450

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 6.8" LCD
  • Resolution: 900x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
56
display

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and Tecno Camon 40 Premier, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Dragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
42/100
568395 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 40 Premier MediaTek Dimensity 8350
73/100 +67.0%
1724757 AnTuTu

Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads Lava Blaze Dragon by 67.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Dragon

$109

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

$450

Launch price difference: $341. Lava Blaze Dragon was $341 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (70/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (94/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (81/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (66/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon by 31 points (73/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on performance (70/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.