Lava Blaze Curve vs Samsung Galaxy M17

The Lava Blaze Curve (2024) runs on the Dimensity 7050, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Curve leads — 54/100 vs 48/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Lava Blaze Curve is faster in AnTuTu (806,012 vs 607,489); the Samsung Galaxy M17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Curve doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M17 is thinner (7.5mm vs 8.8mm).

The Lava Blaze Curve edges out the Samsung Galaxy M17 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Curve

Performance 53
Display 79
Camera 48
Battery 46
Portability 57
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy M17

Performance 46
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 52
Portability 69
Value for money 76

What makes Lava Blaze Curve better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 806012 vs 607489
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 960
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2398 vs 1826
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 192g

  • Higher performance (53/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (48/100 vs 33/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 67/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?


  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better portability (69/100 vs 57/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Curve vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Lava Blaze Curve scores 6 points higher (54/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve leads (48/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (53/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (48/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (69/100 vs 57/100).

Samsung Galaxy M17: The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Curve Samsung Galaxy M17
Processor Dimensity 7050 Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 806012 607489
Geekbench Single 1061 960
Geekbench Multi 2398 1826
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 25W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 5 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 8GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB
OS Android 13 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 1100 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP54
Dimensions 161.8×74.0×8.8 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 189 g 192 g
Launch price — $130

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Curve

  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
48
camera

Samsung Galaxy M17

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Curve

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Samsung Galaxy M17

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Curve

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Samsung Galaxy M17

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless charging: no data
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Curve and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Curve Dimensity 7050
54/100
806012 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy M17 Samsung Exynos 1330
48/100 -32.7%
607489 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Curve leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 32.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Curve

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy M17

$130

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (53/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (48/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (69/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Lava Blaze Curve edges out the Samsung Galaxy M17 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Lava Blaze Curve has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Lava Blaze Curve leads on camera score (48/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Lava Blaze Curve leads on performance (53/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Curve over the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.