Lava Blaze Curve vs Lava Bold 5G
The Lava Blaze Curve (2024) runs on the Dimensity 7050, while the Lava Bold 5G (2025) runs on the Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Curve leads — 54/100 vs 49/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Curve is faster in AnTuTu (806,012 vs 528,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Curve
Lava Bold 5G
What makes Lava Blaze Curve better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 806012 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2398 vs 1980
- Higher performance (53/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (48/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Lava Bold 5G better?
- Lighter: 183g vs 189g
- Better portability (64/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Curve vs the Lava Bold 5G, the Lava Blaze Curve scores 5 points higher (54/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve leads (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (48/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100. In the "portability" category, the Lava Bold 5G is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Curve | Lava Bold 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7050 | Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×74.0×8.8 mm | 162.4×73.8×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Lava Bold 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Lava Bold 5G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Curve
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Lava Bold 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Curve and Lava Bold 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Curve leads Lava Bold 5G by 52.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (48/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Bold 5G is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Lava Bold 5G?
The Lava Blaze Curve edges out the Lava Bold 5G by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Curve and the Lava Bold 5G?
The Lava Blaze Curve has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Lava Bold 5G — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Lava Bold 5G?
The Lava Blaze Curve leads on camera score (48/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Lava Bold 5G?
The Lava Blaze Curve leads on performance (53/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Curve over the Lava Bold 5G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Lava Blaze Curve (53/100 vs 43/100).