Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Tecno Spark 40c
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Tecno Spark 40c (2025) runs on the Helio G81; launch prices were $139 and $102. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 33/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 40c has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 358,608).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Tecno Spark 40c
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Tecno Spark 40c better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $102 vs $139
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Tecno Spark 40c, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 17 points higher (50/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Tecno Spark 40c — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (51/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 40c is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (79/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Tecno Spark 40c | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Helio G81 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 358608 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 165.6×77.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | — | |
| Launch price | $139 | $102 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Spark 40c
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 40c
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark 40c
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Tecno Spark 40c, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Tecno Spark 40c by 93.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $37. Tecno Spark 40c was $37 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (51/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (79/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 40c is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40c (79/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Tecno Spark 40c — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Tecno Spark 40c — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Tecno Spark 40c?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.