Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Tecno Spark 10C
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Tecno Spark 10C (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $139 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 21/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 153,667); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 189g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Tecno Spark 10C
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 846
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 174g vs 189g
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 60/100)
What makes Tecno Spark 10C better?
- Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $139
- Overall rating 21/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Tecno Spark 10C, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 29 points higher (50/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Tecno Spark 10C — 30/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (79/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Tecno Spark 10C are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (79/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Tecno Spark 10C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 846 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android, HIOS 8.6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 163.9×75.5×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $100 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Spark 10C
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 10C
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark 10C
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Tecno Spark 10C, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Tecno Spark 10C by 351.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $39. Tecno Spark 10C was $39 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (51/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (79/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Tecno Spark 10C are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (79/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Spark 10C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C by 29 points (50/100 vs 21/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Tecno Spark 10C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Tecno Spark 10C — 21/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Spark 10C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Spark 10C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Tecno Spark 10C?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.