Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Tecno Pova Neo
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Tecno Pova Neo (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G25; launch prices were $139 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 23/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Neo has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 163,723); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 214g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Tecno Pova Neo
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 163723
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 185
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 521
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 174g vs 214g
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Tecno Pova Neo better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $139
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Tecno Pova Neo, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 27 points higher (50/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Neo leads (63/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Tecno Pova Neo — 26/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (79/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Neo notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (79/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Tecno Pova Neo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Helio G25 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 163723 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 185 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 521 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 480 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 171.4×77.3×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $130 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Pova Neo
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Neo
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova Neo
- 6000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Tecno Pova Neo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Tecno Pova Neo by 323.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $9. Tecno Pova Neo was $9 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (51/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (79/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Neo notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo (79/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Pova Neo?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo by 27 points (50/100 vs 23/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Tecno Pova Neo?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Tecno Pova Neo — 23/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Pova Neo?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Tecno Pova Neo?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Tecno Pova Neo?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.