Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Realme Neo7 Turbo
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Realme Neo7 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e; launch prices were $139 and $270. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads — 70/100 vs 50/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Neo7 Turbo has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5000); the Realme Neo7 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,560,650 vs 693,978); the Realme Neo7 Turbo has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 205g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Realme Neo7 Turbo
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 205g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $270
- Better portability (79/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Realme Neo7 Turbo better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2560650 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 2233 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 7478 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Realme Neo7 Turbo, the Realme Neo7 Turbo scores 20 points higher (70/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (85/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Realme Neo7 Turbo — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (79/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Realme Neo7 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 2560650 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 2233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 7478 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1280x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7200 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 6500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 162.4×76.1×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $270 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Realme Neo7 Turbo
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Realme Neo7 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme Neo7 Turbo leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 72.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $131. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $131 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (84/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (85/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (79/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?
The Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 20 points (70/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Realme Neo7 Turbo?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Realme Neo7 Turbo — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?
The Realme Neo7 Turbo leads on camera score (35/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?
The Realme Neo7 Turbo leads on performance (84/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Realme Neo7 Turbo?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.