Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Lava Play Max

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Lava Play Max (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 48/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Play Max is faster in AnTuTu (879,714 vs 693,978); the Lava Play Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't.

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Lava Play Max by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Lava Play Max

Performance 55
Display 66
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability —
Value for money —

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 1011

  • Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)

What makes Lava Play Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 879714 vs 693978
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2813 vs 2386

  • Higher performance (55/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Lava Play Max, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 2 points higher (50/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Play Max and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Lava Play Max
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 MediaTek Dimensity 7300
AnTuTu 693978 879714
Geekbench Single 1037 1011
Geekbench Multi 2386 2813
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 33W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB 128GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 800 nits —
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP54
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm —
Weight 174 g —
Launch price $139 —

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Lava Play Max

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Lava Play Max

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Lava Play Max

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Lava Play Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Lava Play Max MediaTek Dimensity 7300
48/100 +21.1%
879714 AnTuTu

Lava Play Max leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 21.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Lava Play Max

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Play Max and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Lava Play Max?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Lava Play Max by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Lava Play Max?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Lava Play Max — 48/100.

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Lava Play Max?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.