Infinix Zero 30 vs ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
The Infinix Zero 30 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8020, while the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. Both devices score the same overall rating of 61/100. Key differences: the Infinix Zero 30 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is faster in AnTuTu (1,119,714 vs 979,624).
Infinix Zero 30
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3665 vs 3373
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 30/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1119714 vs 979624
- Better Geekbench Single: 1488 vs 1120
- Lighter: 183g vs 185g
- Higher performance (63/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (63/100 vs 54/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 69/100)
The Infinix Zero 30 and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G received the same MobileRank rating — 61/100. In the "battery" category, the Infinix Zero 30 leads (53/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G and the Infinix Zero 30 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Zero 30 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (53/100 vs 30/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G and the Infinix Zero 30 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100).
| Specification | Infinix Zero 30 | ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 979624 | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1120 | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3665 | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | — | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, XOS 13 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 950 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.5×75.0×7.9 mm | 163.6×75.3×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 183 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Infinix Zero 30
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Front: —
Infinix Zero 30
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Infinix Zero 30
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 4200 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix Zero 30 and ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads Infinix Zero 30 by 12.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G and the Infinix Zero 30 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Zero 30 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (53/100 vs 30/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G and the Infinix Zero 30 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Zero 30 or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
Both devices scored 61/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G.
What is the rating of the Infinix Zero 30 and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Infinix Zero 30 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Zero 30 or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads on camera score (63/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Zero 30 over the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The Infinix Zero 30 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a better fit for active users.