Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (2020) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 10/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 16 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) doesn't.
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (12/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (56/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 16MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 11/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 27 points higher (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) leads (12/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (81/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a bit better (12/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a bit better (56/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P35 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 199111 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 476 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 828 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10.0 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.9×9.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 195 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- Main: 16MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix S5 Pro (16+32)
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) (81/100 vs 11/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a bit better (12/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a bit better (56/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) by 27 points (37/100 vs 10/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Infinix S5 Pro (16+32) is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.