Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Tecno Pova Slim

The Infinix Note 60 Ultra (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400; launch prices were $499 and $230. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads — 78/100 vs 52/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Note 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Infinix Note 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,989,585 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 220g).

The Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 26 points (78/100 vs 52/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix Note 60 Ultra

Performance 76
Display 92
Camera 74
Battery 87
Portability 48
Value for money 78

Tecno Pova Slim

Performance 45
Display 93
Camera 31
Battery 51
Portability 100
Value for money 58

What makes Infinix Note 60 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1989585 vs 581041
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 803
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5160 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (76/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better camera (74/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?

  • Lighter: 156g vs 220g
  • Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $499

  • Better display (93/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 48/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs the Tecno Pova Slim, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra scores 26 points higher (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads (76/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads (74/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads (87/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Infinix Note 60 Ultra — 78/100, Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (76/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim and the Infinix Note 60 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (74/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (87/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Infinix Note 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 48/100).

Infinix Note 60 Ultra: The Infinix Note 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix Note 60 Ultra Tecno Pova Slim
Processor Dimensity 8400 Ultimate MediaTek Dimensity 6400
AnTuTu 1989585 581041
Geekbench Single 1579 803
Geekbench Multi 6100 2047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1208x2644 1224x2720
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5160 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP64
Dimensions 162.3×77.2×7.9 mm 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm
Weight 220 g 156 g
Launch price $499 $230

Camera comparison

Infinix Note 60 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera

Tecno Pova Slim

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera

Display comparison

Infinix Note 60 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
92
display

Tecno Pova Slim

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Battery and charging

Infinix Note 60 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery

Tecno Pova Slim

  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix Note 60 Ultra and Tecno Pova Slim, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix Note 60 Ultra Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
78/100
1989585 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova Slim MediaTek Dimensity 6400
52/100 -242.4%
581041 AnTuTu

Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Slim by 242.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix Note 60 Ultra

$499

Tecno Pova Slim

$230

Launch price difference: $269. Tecno Pova Slim was $269 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (76/100 vs 45/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim and the Infinix Note 60 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (74/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (87/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Infinix Note 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix Note 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 26 points (78/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Infinix Note 60 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Infinix Note 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Tecno Pova Slim — 52/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix Note 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads on camera score (74/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix Note 60 Ultra or the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads on performance (76/100 vs 45/100).

Should you choose the Infinix Note 60 Ultra over the Tecno Pova Slim?

The Infinix Note 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.