Infinix Note 30 5G vs Redmi Note 13 (China)
The Infinix Note 30 5G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Redmi Note 13 (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Note 13 (China) leads — 50/100 vs 47/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Note 30 5G has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 13 (China) doesn't; the Redmi Note 13 (China) is noticeably lighter (173g vs 205g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix Note 30 5G
Redmi Note 13 (China)
What makes Infinix Note 30 5G better?
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Redmi Note 13 (China) better?
- Lighter: 173g vs 205g
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix Note 30 5G vs the Redmi Note 13 (China), the Redmi Note 13 (China) scores 3 points higher (50/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100. In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100. In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 30 5G and the Redmi Note 13 (China) are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) notably outperforms the Infinix Note 30 5G (79/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix Note 30 5G | Redmi Note 13 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | |
| AnTuTu | 573460 | 573460 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 750 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 2020 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, MIUI 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 580 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 168.5×76.5×8.5 mm | 161.1×75.0×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 173 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Infinix Note 30 5G
- Main: 108MP f/1.75
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- Main: 108MP f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Infinix Note 30 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix Note 30 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix Note 30 5G and Redmi Note 13 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 30 5G and the Redmi Note 13 (China) are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) notably outperforms the Infinix Note 30 5G (79/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix Note 30 5G or the Redmi Note 13 (China)?
The Redmi Note 13 (China) edges out the Infinix Note 30 5G by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix Note 30 5G and the Redmi Note 13 (China)?
The Infinix Note 30 5G has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Redmi Note 13 (China) — 50/100.
Should you choose the Infinix Note 30 5G over the Redmi Note 13 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Redmi Note 13 (China) (79/100 vs 50/100).