Infinix Hot 9 Pro vs Oppo A1k
The Infinix Hot 9 Pro (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Oppo A1k (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro leads — 30/100 vs 21/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Hot 9 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 8 MP; the Oppo A1k is noticeably lighter (170g vs 185g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
Oppo A1k
What makes Infinix Hot 9 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (29/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Oppo A1k better?
- Lighter: 170g vs 185g
- Better display (40/100 vs 38/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix Hot 9 Pro vs the Oppo A1k, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro scores 9 points higher (30/100 vs 21/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro leads (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro leads (66/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo A1k and the Infinix Hot 9 Pro are nearly equal (40/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo A1k (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A1k (66/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo A1k is a bit better (72/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix Hot 9 Pro | Oppo A1k | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 177554 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 723 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.1" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1560 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 10, XOS 6.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie); ColorOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 165.0×76.8×8.7 mm | 154.5×73.8×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 170 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Oppo A1k
- Main: 8MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo A1k
- 6.1" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1560
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Infinix Hot 9 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Oppo A1k
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix Hot 9 Pro and Oppo A1k, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo A1k and the Infinix Hot 9 Pro are nearly equal (40/100 vs 38/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo A1k (29/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 9 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo A1k (66/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo A1k is a bit better (72/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 9 Pro or the Oppo A1k?
The Infinix Hot 9 Pro edges out the Oppo A1k by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 9 Pro and the Oppo A1k?
The Infinix Hot 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Oppo A1k — 21/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 9 Pro or the Oppo A1k?
The Infinix Hot 9 Pro leads on camera score (29/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 9 Pro over the Oppo A1k?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Infinix Hot 9 Pro (66/100 vs 32/100).