Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs ZTE Blade A52 Lite
Comparing the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (2022) and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC leads — 17/100 vs 7/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4000); the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite doesn't; the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is noticeably lighter (188g vs 209g).
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4000 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 188g vs 209g
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 38/100)
Comparing the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs the ZTE Blade A52 Lite, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC scores 10 points higher (17/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC leads (45/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (45/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (65/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC | ZTE Blade A52 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T610 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×78.0×8.9 mm | 164.8×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- Main: 13MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- 6000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (45/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (65/100 vs 38/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC or the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade A52 Lite — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite — 7/100.
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC over the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.