Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (2022) runs on the Unisoc T610, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 39/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 108 MP.
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (79/100 vs 52/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 209g
- Better camera (44/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 19 points higher (58/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (44/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC leads (79/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (44/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (79/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T610 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 65W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×78.0×8.9 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- Main: 13MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- 6000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (89/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (44/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 pro (79/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro is noticeably better than the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC is a better fit for those who care about battery life. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.