Infinix Hot 11s NFC vs Poco C75
The Infinix Hot 11s NFC (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G88, while the Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C75 leads — 37/100 vs 35/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the Infinix Hot 11s NFC is faster in AnTuTu (365,001 vs 358,608).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix Hot 11s NFC
Poco C75
What makes Infinix Hot 11s NFC better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 365001 vs 358608
- Overall rating 35/100
What makes Poco C75 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 432 vs 430
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1416 vs 1375
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (30/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (31/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (55/100 vs 54/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix Hot 11s NFC vs the Poco C75, the Poco C75 scores 2 points higher (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco C75 and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC are nearly equal (30/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Poco C75 and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 11s NFC (55/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix Hot 11s NFC | Poco C75 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G88 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 365001 | 358608 | |
| Geekbench Single | 430 | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1375 | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 720x1640 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5160 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 14, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 168.9×77.0×8.8 mm | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Infinix Hot 11s NFC
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Front: 8MP
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Infinix Hot 11s NFC
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix Hot 11s NFC
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix Hot 11s NFC and Poco C75, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix Hot 11s NFC leads Poco C75 by 1.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco C75 and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC are nearly equal (30/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C75 and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C75 and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C75 and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 11s NFC (55/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 11s NFC or the Poco C75?
The Poco C75 edges out the Infinix Hot 11s NFC by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 11s NFC and the Poco C75?
The Infinix Hot 11s NFC has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Poco C75 — 37/100.
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 11s NFC over the Poco C75?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Poco C75 (55/100 vs 38/100).