Infinix GT 50 Pro vs ZTE Blade A35
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads — 66/100 vs 36/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Infinix GT 50 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A35 doesn't.
Infinix GT 50 Pro
ZTE Blade A35
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (34/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 46/100)
- Overall rating 36/100
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the ZTE Blade A35, the Infinix GT 50 Pro scores 30 points higher (66/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the ZTE Blade A35 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 2137843 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | — | |
| Launch price | $349 | — |
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Blade A35
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (92/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (34/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the ZTE Blade A35 are nearly equal (69/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 by 30 points (66/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro leads on camera score (34/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Blade A35 is a better fit for everyday use.