Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $349 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 65/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 1,959,760); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix GT 50 Pro

Performance 76
Display 92
Camera 34
Battery 69
Portability 60
Value for money 64

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88

What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 200g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $999

  • Better display (92/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 1959760
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 69/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 24 points higher (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Infinix GT 50 Pro — 64/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (97/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (93/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (60/100 vs 40/100).

Infinix GT 50 Pro: The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix GT 50 Pro Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1959760 3600724
Geekbench Single 1579 3639
Geekbench Multi 6100 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1208x2644 3200x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions — 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 200 g 226 g
Launch price $349 $999

Camera comparison

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
92
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 30W
69
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix GT 50 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
65/100
1959760 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +45.6%
3600724 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 45.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix GT 50 Pro

$349

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

$999

Launch price difference: $650. Infinix GT 50 Pro was $650 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (97/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (93/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (60/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.