Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $349 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads — 73/100 vs 66/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,382,020 vs 2,137,843).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 edges out the Infinix GT 50 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix GT 50 Pro

Performance 77
Display 92
Camera 34
Battery 69
Portability 60
Value for money 66

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

Performance 96
Display 80
Camera 50
Battery 52
Portability 74
Value for money 54

What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4800 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 200g vs 201g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $1999

  • Longer battery life (69/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (92/100 vs 80/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3382020 vs 2137843
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (50/100 vs 34/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 60/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 scores 7 points higher (73/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads (96/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads (50/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (69/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Infinix GT 50 Pro — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (96/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (50/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (69/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100).

Infinix GT 50 Pro: The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix GT 50 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2137843 3382020
Geekbench Single 1579 3639
Geekbench Multi 6100 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1208x2644 1828x2448
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 45W 45W
Wireless charging 30W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 17 / One UI 9
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP48
Dimensions — 123.9×161.4×4.5 mm
Weight 200 g 201 g
Launch price $349 $1999

Camera comparison

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera

Display comparison

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
92
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1828x2448
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 30W
69
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix GT 50 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
66/100
2137843 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
73/100 +36.8%
3382020 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 36.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix GT 50 Pro

$349

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

$1999

Launch price difference: $1650. Infinix GT 50 Pro was $1650 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (96/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (50/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (69/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 edges out the Infinix GT 50 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 leads on performance (96/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.