Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16

The Infinix GT 30 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $350 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 65/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,591,019); the Infinix GT 30 Pro is noticeably lighter (189g vs 223g).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix GT 30 Pro

Performance 69
Display 93
Camera 43
Battery 65
Portability 66
Value for money 64

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Infinix GT 30 Pro better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 189g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $840

  • Better portability (66/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1591019
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 4313
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 30 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 24 points higher (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Infinix GT 30 Pro — 64/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (100/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (90/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (66/100 vs 42/100).

Infinix GT 30 Pro: The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix GT 30 Pro Vivo iQOO 16
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu 1591019 5498720
Geekbench Single 1398 4327
Geekbench Multi 4313 12873
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2720 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.7×75.8×8.0 mm 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight 189 g 223 g
Launch price $350 $840

Camera comparison

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • Main: 108MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
43
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 30W
65
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix GT 30 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
65/100
1591019 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
89/100 +71.1%
5498720 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 16 leads Infinix GT 30 Pro by 71.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix GT 30 Pro

$350

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Launch price difference: $490. Infinix GT 30 Pro was $490 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (100/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (90/100 vs 65/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (66/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 30 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.