Infinix GT 30 Pro vs TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

The Infinix GT 30 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400; launch prices were $350 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 30 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 57/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 30 Pro has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Infinix GT 30 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,591,019 vs 953,150); the Infinix GT 30 Pro is noticeably lighter (189g vs 227g).

The Infinix GT 30 Pro edges out the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix GT 30 Pro

Performance 69
Display 93
Camera 43
Battery 65
Portability 66
Value for money 64

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

Performance 57
Display 63
Camera 61
Battery 50
Portability 47
Value for money 50

What makes Infinix GT 30 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1591019 vs 953150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 3185
  • Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 227g

  • Higher performance (69/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (65/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (93/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 47/100)

What makes TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $350

  • Better camera (61/100 vs 43/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 30 Pro vs the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra, the Infinix GT 30 Pro scores 8 points higher (65/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro leads (69/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro leads (65/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Infinix GT 30 Pro — 64/100, TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (69/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (93/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (65/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (66/100 vs 47/100).

Infinix GT 30 Pro: The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix GT 30 Pro TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate MediaTek Dimensity 7400
AnTuTu 1591019 953150
Geekbench Single 1398 1061
Geekbench Multi 4313 3185
Display 6.8" AMOLED 7.2" IPS LCD
Resolution 1224x2720 1080x2340
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 45W 33W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 850 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 163.7×75.8×8.0 mm 174.5×81.2×7.6 mm
Weight 189 g 227 g
Launch price $350 $329

Camera comparison

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • Main: 108MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
43
camera

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Display comparison

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

  • 7.2" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
63
display

Battery and charging

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 30W
65
battery

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix GT 30 Pro and TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix GT 30 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
65/100
1591019 AnTuTu
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400
57/100 -66.9%
953150 AnTuTu

Infinix GT 30 Pro leads TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra by 66.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix GT 30 Pro

$350

TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra

$329

Launch price difference: $21. TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra was $21 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (69/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (93/100 vs 63/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (61/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (65/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (66/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro edges out the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads on camera score (61/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro leads on performance (69/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 30 Pro over the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.