Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Oppo Reno13 (China)
The Infinix GT 30 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Oppo Reno13 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 30 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 64/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno13 (China) has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Infinix GT 30 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,757,190 vs 1,724,757).
Infinix GT 30 Pro
Oppo Reno13 (China)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1757190 vs 1724757
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (93/100 vs 85/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 181g vs 189g
- Better camera (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Infinix GT 30 Pro vs the Oppo Reno13 (China), the Infinix GT 30 Pro scores 1 points higher (65/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 70/100. In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 (China) and the Infinix GT 30 Pro are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Oppo Reno13 (China) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno13 (China) is a bit better (78/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 30 Pro | Oppo Reno13 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | |
| AnTuTu | 1757190 | 1724757 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 1398 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 4313 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1256x2760 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.8×8.0 mm | 157.9×74.7×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 181 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Oppo Reno13 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno13 (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1256x2760
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Oppo Reno13 (China)
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix GT 30 Pro and Oppo Reno13 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 30 Pro leads Oppo Reno13 (China) by 1.9% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 70/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 (China) and the Infinix GT 30 Pro are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Oppo Reno13 (China) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno13 (China) is a bit better (78/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Oppo Reno13 (China)?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro edges out the Oppo Reno13 (China) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Oppo Reno13 (China)?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Oppo Reno13 (China) — 64/100.
Should you choose the Infinix GT 30 Pro over the Oppo Reno13 (China)?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Oppo Reno13 (China) is a better fit for active users.