Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Infinix GT 30 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $350 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 65/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 30 Pro has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,591,019); the Infinix GT 30 Pro is noticeably lighter (189g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Infinix GT 30 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix GT 30 Pro

Performance 69
Display 93
Camera 43
Battery 65
Portability 66
Value for money 64

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

What makes Infinix GT 30 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $1799

  • Better display (93/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 52/100)

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1591019
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 4313
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 65/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 30 Pro vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 18 points higher (83/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Infinix GT 30 Pro — 64/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (90/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Infinix GT 30 Pro are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

Infinix GT 30 Pro: The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix GT 30 Pro Motorola Razr Fold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 1591019 3057215
Geekbench Single 1398 2833
Geekbench Multi 4313 9119
Display 6.8" AMOLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2720 2480x2200
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 45W 68W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 164
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IPX9
Dimensions 163.7×75.8×8.0 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 189 g 285 g
Launch price $350 $1799

Camera comparison

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • Main: 108MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
43
camera

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Display comparison

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Infinix GT 30 Pro

  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 30W
65
battery

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix GT 30 Pro and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix GT 30 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
65/100
1591019 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100 +48.0%
3057215 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Infinix GT 30 Pro by 48.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix GT 30 Pro

$350

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Launch price difference: $1449. Infinix GT 30 Pro was $1449 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (90/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 30 Pro (91/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Infinix GT 30 Pro are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Infinix GT 30 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 30 Pro over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.