Infinix GT 20 Pro vs ZTE Axon 30S
The Infinix GT 20 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, while the ZTE Axon 30S (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 20 Pro leads — 60/100 vs 54/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 20 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the Infinix GT 20 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,287,602 vs 1,010,069).
Infinix GT 20 Pro
ZTE Axon 30S
- Higher AnTuTu: 1287602 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4207 vs 3520
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (65/100 vs 61/100)
- Better camera (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1256
- Faster charging: 55W vs 45W
- Lighter: 189g vs 194g
- Better portability (67/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Infinix GT 20 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 30S, the Infinix GT 20 Pro scores 6 points higher (60/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro leads (48/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (65/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (48/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 30S is a bit better (67/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 20 Pro | ZTE Axon 30S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 1287602 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1256 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4207 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 55W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, XOS 14 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×75.4×8.2 mm | 170.2×77.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 189 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Infinix GT 20 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 30S
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Infinix GT 20 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 30S
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 20 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 30S
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 55W
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix GT 20 Pro and ZTE Axon 30S, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 20 Pro leads ZTE Axon 30S by 27.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (65/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (48/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 30S is a bit better (67/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 20 Pro or the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Infinix GT 20 Pro edges out the ZTE Axon 30S by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 20 Pro and the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Infinix GT 20 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the ZTE Axon 30S — 54/100.
Should you choose the Infinix GT 20 Pro over the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Infinix GT 20 Pro is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 30S is a better fit for active users.