Infinix GT 20 Pro vs Oscal Flat 3C

The Infinix GT 20 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, while the Oscal Flat 3C (2026) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T310. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 20 Pro leads — 60/100 vs 34/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 32 MP; the Infinix GT 20 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Oscal Flat 3C doesn't.

The Infinix GT 20 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C by 26 points (60/100 vs 34/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix GT 20 Pro

Performance 65
Display 89
Camera 46
Battery 48
Portability 60
Value for money —

Oscal Flat 3C

Performance —
Display 32
Camera 22
Battery 52
Portability 50
Value for money 48

What makes Infinix GT 20 Pro better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 32MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 194g vs 199g

  • Better camera (46/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Oscal Flat 3C better?


  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 48/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 20 Pro vs the Oscal Flat 3C, the Infinix GT 20 Pro scores 26 points higher (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro leads (46/100 vs 22/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (89/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro notably outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (46/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Oscal Flat 3C and the Infinix GT 20 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).

Infinix GT 20 Pro: The Infinix GT 20 Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix GT 20 Pro Oscal Flat 3C
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate Unisoc Tiger T310
AnTuTu 1306340 —
Geekbench Single 1256 —
Geekbench Multi 4207 —
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2436 720x1612
Refresh rate 144 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 45W —
Main camera 108 MP 32 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 4GB
Storage 256GB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 14, XOS 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits —
NFC yes no
Protection IP54 —
Dimensions 164.3×75.4×8.2 mm 165.3×76.7×8.9 mm
Weight 194 g 199 g
Launch price — $130

Camera comparison

Infinix GT 20 Pro

  • Main: 108MP f/1.8
  • Front: 32MP
46
camera

Oscal Flat 3C

  • Main: 32MP
  • Front: 13MP
22
camera

Display comparison

Infinix GT 20 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display

Oscal Flat 3C

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Battery and charging

Infinix GT 20 Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Oscal Flat 3C

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix GT 20 Pro

Price unknown

Oscal Flat 3C

$130

Detailed category analysis

display

In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (89/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro notably outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C (46/100 vs 22/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Oscal Flat 3C and the Infinix GT 20 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 20 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix GT 20 Pro or the Oscal Flat 3C?

The Infinix GT 20 Pro significantly outperforms the Oscal Flat 3C by 26 points (60/100 vs 34/100).

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 20 Pro and the Oscal Flat 3C?

The Infinix GT 20 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Oscal Flat 3C — 34/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 20 Pro or the Oscal Flat 3C?

The Infinix GT 20 Pro leads on camera score (46/100 vs 22/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 20 Pro over the Oscal Flat 3C?

The Infinix GT 20 Pro is a better fit for active users.