Infinix GT 10 Pro vs ZTE Blade V40 Design
The Infinix GT 10 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8050, while the ZTE Blade V40 Design (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T616. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 10 Pro leads — 56/100 vs 30/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 10 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP.
Infinix GT 10 Pro
ZTE Blade V40 Design
- Better Geekbench Single: 1146 vs 400
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2336 vs 1350
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (56/100 vs 19/100)
- Better camera (46/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 57/100)
- Overall rating 30/100
Comparing the Infinix GT 10 Pro vs the ZTE Blade V40 Design, the Infinix GT 10 Pro scores 26 points higher (56/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro leads (56/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro leads (46/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro leads (48/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design (56/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design (79/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design (46/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design (48/100 vs 33/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 10 Pro | ZTE Blade V40 Design | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 | Unisoc Tiger T616 | |
| AnTuTu | 1026838 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1146 | 400 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2336 | 1350 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 1 major Android upgrades, XOS 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 900 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×75.9×8.1 mm | — | |
| Weight | 187 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Infinix GT 10 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade V40 Design
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Infinix GT 10 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade V40 Design
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Infinix GT 10 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V40 Design
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design (56/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design (79/100 vs 57/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design (46/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design (48/100 vs 33/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 10 Pro or the ZTE Blade V40 Design?
The Infinix GT 10 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Design by 26 points (56/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 10 Pro and the ZTE Blade V40 Design?
The Infinix GT 10 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the ZTE Blade V40 Design — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 10 Pro or the ZTE Blade V40 Design?
The Infinix GT 10 Pro leads on camera score (46/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 10 Pro or the ZTE Blade V40 Design?
The Infinix GT 10 Pro leads on performance (56/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 10 Pro over the ZTE Blade V40 Design?
The Infinix GT 10 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade V40 Design is a better fit for everyday use.