Infinix GT 10 Pro vs ZTE Axon 41 5G
The Infinix GT 10 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8050, while the ZTE Axon 41 5G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. Both devices score the same overall rating of 56/100. Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the Infinix GT 10 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,026,838 vs 1,010,069); the Infinix GT 10 Pro is noticeably lighter (187g vs 203g).
Infinix GT 10 Pro
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Higher AnTuTu: 1026838 vs 1010069
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 187g vs 203g
- Better display (79/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (65/100 vs 41/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1146
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2336
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 56/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 48/100)
The Infinix GT 10 Pro and the ZTE Axon 41 5G received the same MobileRank rating — 56/100. In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (61/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G and the Infinix GT 10 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 41 5G (65/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 10 Pro | ZTE Axon 41 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 1026838 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1146 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2336 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 1 major Android upgrades, XOS 13 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 900 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×75.9×8.1 mm | 163.9×76.2×9.5 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Infinix GT 10 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Infinix GT 10 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Infinix GT 10 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix GT 10 Pro and ZTE Axon 41 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 10 Pro leads ZTE Axon 41 5G by 1.7% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (61/100 vs 56/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G and the Infinix GT 10 Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 10 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 41 5G (65/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 10 Pro or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
Both devices scored 56/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the ZTE Axon 41 5G.
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 10 Pro and the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Infinix GT 10 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the ZTE Axon 41 5G — 56/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 10 Pro or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G leads on camera score (51/100 vs 46/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 10 Pro or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The ZTE Axon 41 5G leads on performance (61/100 vs 56/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 10 Pro over the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Infinix GT 10 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 41 5G is a better fit for active users.