Huawei Pura 70 Ultra vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (2024) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9010, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1200 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 75/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,155,792); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 163); the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (226g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Performance 65
Display 85
Camera 90
Battery 80
Portability 39
Value for money 60
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 71
Portability 52
Value for money 76
What makes Huawei Pura 70 Ultra better?
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 50W
  • Lighter: 226g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $1200 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1155792
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1400
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4500

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 11 points higher (86/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra — 60/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (98/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "battery" category, the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 71/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra: The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Motorola Razr Fold
Processor HiSilicon Kirin 9010 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1155792 3942923
Geekbench Single 1400 3640
Geekbench Multi 4500 11033
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2844x1260 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 80W
Wireless charging 80W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 163 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 10 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS HarmonyOS 4.2 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX9
Dimensions 162.6×75.1×8.4 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 226 g 285 g
Launch price $1200 $1799
Camera comparison
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
90
camera
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Display comparison
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2844x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
71
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Pura 70 Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9010
75/100
1155792 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100 +70.7%
3942923 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Huawei Pura 70 Ultra by 70.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
$1200
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799

Launch price difference: $599. Huawei Pura 70 Ultra was $599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (98/100 vs 65/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 71/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 86/100.

Which is more powerful: the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Pura 70 Ultra over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Huawei Pura 70 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.