Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate (2026) runs on the Kirin 9050 Pro, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400; launch prices were $2799 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate leads — 70/100 vs 65/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 5600); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,052,566 vs 1,825,771); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is noticeably lighter (212g vs 299g).

The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate edges out the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate

Performance 75
Display 66
Camera 67
Battery 74
Portability 52
Value for money 48

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

Performance 76
Display 94
Camera 32
Battery 71
Portability 51
Value for money 80

What makes Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 1636 vs 1579

  • Better camera (67/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (74/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2052566 vs 1825771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 5775
  • Bigger battery: 7620 vs 5600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 212g vs 299g
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $2799

  • Higher performance (76/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 66/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate scores 5 points higher (70/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate leads (67/100 vs 32/100). Value score: Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate — 48/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate are nearly equal (76/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate (94/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (67/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo are nearly equal (74/100 vs 71/100). In the "portability" category, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate: The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo: The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
Processor Kirin 9050 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400
AnTuTu 1825771 2052566
Geekbench Single 1636 1579
Geekbench Multi 5775 6100
Display 10.2" Tri-foldable LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2232x3184 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5600 mAh 7620 mAh
Charging 66W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS HarmonyOS 7.0 Android 15
Brightness (peak) — 4400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP58 IP65
Dimensions 219.2×157.2×4.0 mm 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm
Weight 299 g 212 g
Launch price $2799 $250

Camera comparison

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
67
camera

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Display comparison

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate

  • 10.2" Tri-foldable LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2232x3184
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
66
display

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • Wireless: 50W
74
battery

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 7620 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
71
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate Kirin 9050 Pro
70/100
1825771 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 8400
65/100 +11.0%
2052566 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate by 11.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate

$2799

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

$250

Launch price difference: $2549. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo was $2549 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate are nearly equal (76/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate (94/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (67/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo are nearly equal (74/100 vs 71/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate edges out the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate leads on camera score (67/100 vs 32/100).

Should you choose the Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.